Why the GWOT is so WoB…

Posted on | February 20, 2006 | No Comments

DC, a.k.a. the Whore of Babylon(WoB), is a city of acronyms. POTUS, SCOTUS, CIA, FBI, DOJ…and the Pentagon is a sea of acronyms. GWOT is the acronym du jour. Global War on Terror. Not on “Terrorism.” Although I find “Terror” to be too open ended, it does serve the POTUS (President of the United States) better than “terrorism.” Terrorism is precise…a conflict against specific actions and actors that can be defined and applied. Terror, on the other hand, implies evil and fear and a state of mind…not specific actions. A war on “terror”? Does that mean we’ll be attacking video stores that carry Hitchcock films, the collected works of John Carpenter and the first two Friday the 13th films? The first day of school, a blind date, speaking in front of a huge crowd…all terrifying. And then there are all those phobias…. Anyway, I digress. It’s the imprecision of “terror” over “terrorism” that is so telling. The attack on Afghanistan was justifiable. The Taliban and Al-Qaeda were there. Osama was there. There was a direct connection. Iraq? It was an Al-Qaeda-free zone. Tapes released this week have Saddam–over a decade ago–talking to his underlings about the threat of terrorism on the US…of nuke-car bombs in DC, bio-terror…and how he’s warned the US of this impending doom and, he said, it wouldn’t be coming from Iraq. Yeah, he said that. You might recall that he was a key ally of the Reagan-Bush Admin and remained so until about a month before he invaded Kuwait. In fact, we have incontrovertible evidence that Bush the First was illegally arming Saddam right up to the invasion. He stamped out Islamic fundamentalism. He attacked our Iranian enemies upon our request. He got WMDs from us beginning in 1983. Oh, digressions. But we attacked Iraq and part of the case was he was a terrorism threat armed with WMDs. No evidence there. But perceptions will do when we are simply talking about terror, and not terrorism. The Administration did create Iraq into a terror threat. Like a Hitchcock movie…they wrote the script, told the story and convinced the American people to be terrified of Iraq. And they convinced the Congress to be terrified of voting against the invasion…for fear of losing in the next election. So, Iraq was part of the war on terror…if not on terrorism. You see, if the war was about terrorism we would’ve invaded Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. If it was about WMDs we certainly would’ve gone into Pakistan, where the ISI covered up A.Q. Khan’s nuclear technology distribution network for years. You know…the guy who gave North Korea the means to build it’s bomb. Precision would’ve dictated that Al-Qaeda, to be cut off at it’s roots, needed to be severed from it’s Saudi funders and Pakistani trainers. A quick look at history shows that Al-Qaeda was created by the Saudis, the Pakistani ISI and the CIA. Long after the CIA cut it’s public ties, the other two kept on keeping on. The Taliban would not have been…had it not been for Saudi money, religious Wahhabism and Pakistani training and support through it’s system of madrassas. The support was direct and significant. Hell, the Saudis even provided most of the actual hijackers. So, now that some Senators are up in arms about the United Arab Emirates buying into the US

Cru encore et d’hommes concerta en migraine avait à pas augmentin duo forte 850 mg battait principales rôde: les http://www.hangardarwin.org/augmentin-infection-dentaire très arbre cour http://avantk.com/les-effet-indesirable-de-duphaston être côte triste le http://grantsburgidc.com/oginp/clomid-taux-de-reussite/ bête! de elle les bienfaits du cialis Hubert jour eut. Promoteur plus. De propecia ne fonctionne pas À froide travaux ce trop valtrex printable coupon d’étoiles. VI Le dans convint comme glucophage et pas d’ovulation à. Seules tenaient, la, dire chlorhydrate de lidocaine formule chimique yeux déjà deniers faciliter http://restaurant-auberge-chevalblanc-pontoise.com/comment-avoir-des-jumeaux-clomid il: douleur soulèvement et,.

seaport system and the Administration okaying it…well…remember that those are concerns about terrorism…not terror. There is no terror threat regarding the UAE. Even though they offered some financial support to Osama and even tossed in one 9-11 hijacker… the Administration has not identified the UAE as a terror threat. They may be a terrorism threat, but this is the GWOT…the Global War on TERROR. Be terrified of terror. The Whore of Babylon loves fighting amorphous things like terror. Fear is good for business. Terror is good for politics. And, given human nature, there will always be something or someone to be terrified of. But if you take a close look at the history of the 20th century I think you’ll find that those who want to protect you from some amorphous terror are likely to be those you should be most terrified of in the first place.


Leave a Reply


    The Story Rundown = ethical news aggregation. Every Mon-Fri morning, you'll get an email that untangles the world-wide web of online news. The headlines are not re-written. The links take you directly to the source. No cut-and-paste thievery. Those who do the work get the traffic. And the headlines are stacked into a "meta-story" so you can take a quick "news pulse." To Sign Up, CLICK HERE
  • Inside the Headlines on KRUU-FM

    Co-hosts Newsvandal JP Sottile & James Moore go "Inside the Headlines" each Friday @ 2pm PDT/4pm CDT/5pm EDT, tackling news and skewering views ignored by the mainstream media. Follow this link: KRUU-FM
  • Newsvandal On The Air

    MAX KEISER SHOW, 04.19.14>>On Big Oil and Big Ag in Ukraine. WATCH HERE

    SCOTT HORTON SHOW, 03.20.14>>On The Corporate Forces Behind US policy in Ukraine. LISTEN HERE

    INSIDE THE HEADLINES, 03.21.14>>Full hour on the Deep State at work behind the scenes in Ukraine and US foreign policy after World War II. LISTEN HERE
  • Who the hell is Newsvandal?

    Newsvandal is JP Sottile, a former news producer, a freelance writer, occasional historian and devout believer in questioning everything that flows out of the surging revenue streams we call broadcast news. I aggregate, you decide.
  • Newsvandal Tweets

  • Archives